[1]周方,李雷,傅大放,等.生态声屏障设计与效果分析[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2012,42(4):675-679.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2012.04.019]
 Zhou Fang,Li Lei,Fu Dafang,et al.Design and effect analysis on noise reduction of ecological barrier[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2012,42(4):675-679.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2012.04.019]
点击复制

生态声屏障设计与效果分析()
分享到:

《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-0505/CN:32-1178/N]

卷:
42
期数:
2012年第4期
页码:
675-679
栏目:
交通运输工程
出版日期:
2012-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Design and effect analysis on noise reduction of ecological barrier
作者:
周方12 李雷1 傅大放1 李建平3
1 东南大学土木工程学院,南京 210096; 2 江苏省建筑工程质量检测中心有限公司, 南京 210028; 3 上海申华声学设备有限公司,上海200000
Author(s):
Zhou Fang12 Li Lei1 Fu Dafang1 Li Jianping3
1 School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
2 Jiangsu Testing Center for Quality of Construction Engineering Co.,LTD, Nanjing 210028,China
3 Shanghai Shenhua Acoustics Equipment Co.,L
关键词:
生态声屏障设计 RAYNOISE软件模拟 效果分析
Keywords:
design of ecological barrier simulation by RAYNOISE software effect analysis
分类号:
U491.9
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2012.04.019
摘要:
设计了一种将吸声降噪、景观绿化2种功能有机结合的生态声屏障,利用RAYNOISE声学软件对生态声屏障、普通直立型声屏障的降噪效果进行数字模拟比较,对生态声屏障的降噪插入损失进行了实验测量.声学软件RAYNOISE的仿真模拟结果表明:生态声屏障有较好的降噪效果,在声影区内高度4 m以下的生态声屏障比直立声屏障插入损失大0~4.63 dB,在高于4 m后生态声屏障的插入损失虽然大于直立型但不大于1 dB.实验结果表明:频率为63~500 Hz时,生态声屏障的插入损失为0~28 dB,并且随着频率的增加逐渐增大; 当频率大于500 Hz时,插入损失不再增大,维持在20 dB左右.
Abstract:
A kind of ecological barrier with good effect on noise reduction and landscaping is introduced. Effect on noise reduction of ecological barrier and vertical sound barrier is compared by the Raynoise software. The noise insertion loss of ecological sound barrier is measured experimentally. Simulation of the acoustic software RAYNOISE shows that: in the acoustic shadow zone, noise reduction effect of ecological sound barrier is better than normal barrier for about 0 to 4.63dB especially below a height of 4 m; for higher than 4 m insertion loss of ecological sound barrier is greater than the vertical-type but not more than 1dB. The experiment shows that in 63 to 500Hz frequency insertion loss is about 0 to 28dB, which gradually increases with increasing frequency; when frequency is greater than 500Hz insertion loss increases no more, maintaining at 20dB or so.

参考文献/References:

[1] 吕玉恒.国内噪声控制近况评述[J].噪声与振动控制,2001,21(6):14-17.
  Lü Yuheng.Review of the state of arts of noise control engineering in China[J].Noise and Vibration Control,2001,21(6):14-17.(in Chinese)
[2] 毛冉,李晓倩.高速公路绿化降噪效果的心理感受调查与分析[J].现代交通技术,2010,7(4):107-110.
  Mao Ran,Li Xiaoqian.Psychological investigation and analysis of expressway noise reduction with green belt[J].Modern Transportation Technology,2010,7(4):107-110.(in Chinese)
[3] 张玮晨.生态屏障对干线公路两侧声环境降噪效果的探析[J].噪声与振动控制,2011,31(4):128-131.
  Zhang Weichen.Analysis of ecological barrier’s reduction of the highway’s traffic noise[J].Noise and Vibration Control,2011,31(4):128-131.(in Chinese)
[4] 刘银生,赵新飞.公路生态声屏障设计研究[J].公路,2007(7):196-199.
[5] Watts G R,Morgan P A,Surgand M.Assessment of the diffraction efficiency of novel barrier profiles using an MLS-based approach[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration,2004,274(3/4/5):669-683.
[6] Ishizuka T,Fujiwara K.Performance of noise barriers with various edge shapes and acoustical conditions[J].Applied Acoustics,2004,65(2):125-141.
[7] Monazzam M R,Lam Y W.Performance of profiled single noise barriers covered with quadratic residue diffusers[J].Applied Acoustics,2005,66(6):709-730.
[8] Palma M J C,Samagaio A.Acoustic performance of a noise barrier coated with an absorptive material[J].Noise Control Engineering Journal,2006,54(4):245-250.
[9] Duhamel D.Shape optimization of noise barriers using genetic algorithms[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration,2006,297(1/2):432-443.
[10] 中国科学院声学研究所.HJ/T90—2004声屏障声学设计和测量规范[S].北京:中国环境出版社,2001.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介: 周方(1974—),男,博士生; 傅大放(联系人),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,fdf@seu.edu.cn.
基金项目: 江苏高等学校优势学科建设工程资助项目(1105007001).
引文格式: 周方,李雷,傅大放,等:生态声屏障设计与效果分析[J].东南大学学报:自然科学版,2012,42(4):675-679. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2012.04.019]
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-07-20