[1]冯玉龙,吴京,孟少平,等.单层屈曲约束支撑框架的抗震参数[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,45(3):544-549.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2015.03.023]
 Feng Yulong,Wu Jing,Meng Shaoping,et al.Seismic parameters of single-layer buckling-restrained braced frame[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2015,45(3):544-549.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2015.03.023]
点击复制

单层屈曲约束支撑框架的抗震参数()
分享到:

《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-0505/CN:32-1178/N]

卷:
45
期数:
2015年第3期
页码:
544-549
栏目:
土木工程
出版日期:
2015-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Seismic parameters of single-layer buckling-restrained braced frame
作者:
冯玉龙吴京孟少平付康
东南大学混凝土及预应力混凝土结构教育部重点实验室, 南京 210096
Author(s):
Feng Yulong Wu Jing Meng Shaoping Fu Kang
Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
关键词:
单层屈曲约束支撑框架 抗震参数 合理参数值 布置方式
Keywords:
single-layer buckling-restrained braced frame seismic parameters reasonable parameter values layout principle
分类号:
TU352.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2015.03.023
摘要:
为了给屈曲约束支撑框架设计提供参考,对单层屈曲约束支撑框架的抗震参数进行了研究.通过结构侧移分析,推导出表征该结构体系受力和变形特性的3个关键参数:支撑-框架刚度比、支撑-框架屈服强度比和梁-柱线刚度比.以特定地震动下结构最大位移和残余位移作为评价指标,对结构进行了参数化分析.分析结果表明:当支撑-框架刚度比和梁-柱线刚度比较小时,增大刚度比可以明显减小结构位移;支撑-框架屈服强度比主要对结构的屈服位移和机制影响较大;支撑-框架刚度比、支撑-框架屈服强度比和梁-柱线刚度比的合理值分别为2,0.7和0.45~5.00.据此设计了2个单层算例,并进行了抗震性能分析.结果表明:在结构中,形成了支撑-梁-柱屈服机制;当支撑屈服后,框架承担的剪力比逐渐增大;支撑布置方式对结构顶点位移响应基本无影响,对相邻柱的轴力影响则较大.
Abstract:
To provide the design reference for the frame structure with buckling-restrained brace(BRB), the seismic parameters of the single-layer buckling-restrained braced frame(BRBF)structure are studied. By lateral displacement analysis, three key parameters characterizing the structural force and deformation, the BRB-to-frame stiffness ratio, the BRB-to-frame yield strength ratio and the beam-to-column line stiffness ratio, are derived. By taking the maximum displacement and the residual displacement under the specific ground motion as the evaluation indexes, parametric analyses are carried out. The analysis results show that when the BRB-to-frame stiffness ratio and the beam-to-column line stiffness ratio are small, both kinds of displacements decrease with the increase of the ratios. The BRB-to-frame yield strength ratio influences greatly on the structural yield displacement and mechanism. The reasonable values of the BRB-to-frame stiffness ratio, the BRB-to-frame yield strength ratio and the beam-to-column line stiffness ratio are 2, 0.7 and 0.45~5.00, respectively. Base on these reasonable values, two examples are designed and the corresponding seismic performance is analyzed. The results show that the BRB-beam-column yield mechanism is formed in the structures. After the BRB yields, the ratio of the shear forces of the frame increases gradually. The layout principle of BRB has almost no obvious influence on the roof displacement response, but affects significantly the axial force of the adjacent columns.

参考文献/References:

[1] Uang Chia-Ming, Nakashima Masayoshi, Tsai Keh-Chyuan. Research and application of buckling-restrained braced frames[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2004, 4(4): 301-313.
[2] 孙逊, 崔永平, 黄明, 等. 人民日报社报刊综合业务楼结构设计[J]. 建筑结构,2012, 42(9): 52-55.
  Sun Xun, Cui Yongping, Huang Ming, et al. Structural design of the People’s Daily office building[J]. Building Structure, 2012, 42(9): 52-55.(in Chinese)
[3] Jones P, Zareian F. Seismic response of a 40-storey buckling-restrained braced frame designed for the Los Angeles region[J]. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2013, 22(3): 291-299.
[4] Ariyaratana C, Fahnestock L A. Evaluation of buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance considering reserve strength[J]. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(1): 77-89.
[5] 贾明明, 张素梅. 采用抑制屈曲支撑的钢框架结构性能分析[J]. 东南大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 37(6): 1041-1047.
  Jia Mingming, Zhang Sumei. Performance of steel frame installed with buckling-restrained braces[J]. Journal of Southeast University: Natural Science Edition, 2007, 37(6): 1041-1047.(in Chinese)
[6] Ρalmer K D, Roeder C W, Lehman D E, et al. Experimental performance of steel braced frames subjected to bidirectional loading[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2012, 139(8): 1274-1284.
[7] American Institute of Steel Construction. ANSI/AISC 341-10 Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings[S]. Chicago:American Institute of Steel Construction, 2010.
[8] 上海市机电设计研究院有限公司,同济大学,中船第九设计研究院工程有限公司. DG/TJ08-32—2008 高层建筑钢结构设计规范[S]. 上海: 上海市建设和交通委员会, 2008.
[9] Kim J, Choi H. Behavior and design of structures with buckling-restrained braces[J]. Engineering Structures, 2004, 26(6): 693-706.
[10]贾明明, 张素梅, 吕大刚, 等. 抑制屈曲支撑布置原则对钢框架抗震性能的影响[J]. 工程力学, 2009, 26(7):140-146.
  Jia Mingming, Zhang Sumei, Lü Dagang, et al. Influence of layout principle of buckling-restrained braces on aseismic performance of steel frame[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(7): 140-146.(in Chinese)
[11]赵瑛, 郭彦林. 防屈曲支撑框架设计方法研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2010, 40(1): 38-43, 85.
  Zhao Ying, Guo Yanlin. Research on design method of buckling restrained braced frames[J]. Building Structure, 2010, 40(1): 38-43, 85.(in Chinese)
[12] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB 50011—2010 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2014-12-30.
作者简介: 冯玉龙(1990—),男,博士生;吴京(联系人),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,seuwj@seu.edu.cn.
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51278105)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目、江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目(KYLX_0153).
引用本文: 冯玉龙,吴京,孟少平,等.单层屈曲约束支撑框架的抗震参数[J].东南大学学报:自然科学版,2015,45(3):544-549. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2015.03.023]
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-05-20