[1]薛亚东,杨文亮,黄宏伟,等.围压条件下TBM边缘滚刀破岩模式[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,47(6):1239-1247.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.06.025]
 Xue Yadong,Yang Wenliang,Huang Hongwei,et al.Cutting rock modes of TBM gauge cutters under confining pressures[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2017,47(6):1239-1247.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.06.025]
点击复制

围压条件下TBM边缘滚刀破岩模式()
分享到:

《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-0505/CN:32-1178/N]

卷:
47
期数:
2017年第6期
页码:
1239-1247
栏目:
交通运输工程
出版日期:
2017-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Cutting rock modes of TBM gauge cutters under confining pressures
作者:
薛亚东12杨文亮3黄宏伟12张学强4
1同济大学地下建筑与工程系, 上海 200092; 2同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室, 上海 200092; 3上海市城市建设设计研究总院(集团)有限公司, 上海 200125; 4山东天工岩土工程设备有限公司, 聊城 252000
Author(s):
Xue Yadong12 Yang Wenliang3 Huang Hongwei12 Zhang Xueqiang4
1Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongii University, Shanghai 200092, China
2Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
3Shanghai Urban Construction Design & Research Institute(Group)Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200125, China
4Shandong Techgong Geotechnical Engineering Equipment Co., Ltd, Liaocheng 252000, China
关键词:
TBM 边缘滚刀 围压 破岩模式
Keywords:
TBM(tunnel boring machine) gauge cutter confining pressure cutting rock mode
分类号:
U452
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.06.025
摘要:
为了解边缘滚刀的破岩特性,对其破岩过程与机理开展了系统研究.建立了某深埋全断面岩石隧道掘进机(TBM)开挖隧道三维有限元模型,在掌子面过渡圆弧周边设置边缘滚刀破岩模型边界,导出边界上的围压数值并施加在颗粒流模型边界上.模型考虑5种围压模式,相位角为0°,30°,60°,90°时的岩石应力状态分别记为模式1~模式4,无围压状态记为模式5.结果表明:围压模式1中岩石双向应力和、双向应力比均最大,破岩比能最低;模式3中,岩石受到滚刀水平向力作用而近似处于双向等值应力状态,破岩比能最高;从模式1到模式3,有利破岩的竖向应力递减;从模式5到模式3,不利破岩的水平应力增加,导致模式3条件下刀具破岩效率最低;有围压模式的侧向力系数和滚刀切入率均高于无围压模式.
Abstract:
To acknowledge the rock breaking characteristics of the gauge cutters, systematic research on their rock breaking process and mechanism was carried out. A 3D finite element model of a deep-buried full-face rock tunnel boring machine(TBM)was established and calculated to obtain the geo-stress distribution of gauge cutter working area. Then, the corresponding pressure was applied on the particle flow code models boundaries. Five confining pressure models were considered. The rock stress states at phase angles 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° were denoted as mode 1 to mode 4, and no confined pressure was denoted as mode 5. The numerical simulation results show that the sum of biaxial stress and its ratio of mode 1 are the largest among all modes. The specific energy of mode 1 is the lowest. In mode 3, the rock is subjected to the horizontal force of the cutters and is approximately in the bidirectional equivalent stress state. It has the highest specific energy. From mode 1 to mode 3, the vertical stress, which can promote rock fragmentation, is decreasing; from mode 5 to mode 3, the horizontal stress, which can suppress rock fragmentation, is increasing. Thus, the cutting efficiency of model 3 is the lowest. The results also show that the side force coefficients and cutting rates of cutters in the confining pressure modes are higher than those in the none-confining pressure mode.

参考文献/References:

[1] Wijk G. A model of tunnel boring machine performance[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 1992, 10(1): 19-40. DOI:10.1007/bf00881 969.
[2] Gertsch R, Gertsch L, Rostami J. Disc cutting tests in Colorado Red Granite: Implications for TBM performance prediction[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(2): 238-246. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.07.007.
[3] Moon T,Oh J. Study of optimal rock-cutting conditions for hard rock TBM using the discrete element method[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2012, 45(5): 837-849. DOI:10.1007/s00603-011-0180-3.
[4] 谭青,易念恩,夏毅敏,等.TBM滚刀破岩动态特性与最优刀间距研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(12):2453-2464. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.12.009.
Tan Qing, Yi Nianen, Xia Yimin, et al. Research on rock dynamic fragmentation characteristics by TBM cutters and cutter spacing optimization[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(12): 2453-2464. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.12.009. (in Chinese)
[5] 龚秋明,何冠文,赵晓豹,等.掘进机刀盘滚刀间距对北山花岗岩破岩效率的影响实验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2015,37(1):54-60. DOI:10.11779/CJGE201501005.
Gong Qiuming, He Guanwen, Zhao Xiaobao, et al. Influence of different cutter spacings on rock fragmentation efficiency of Beishan granite by TBM[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(1): 54-60. DOI:10.11779/CJGE201501005. (in Chinese)
[6] Innaurato N, Oggeri C, Oreste P P, et al. Experimental and numerical studies on rock breaking with TBM tools under high stress confinement[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2007, 40(5): 429-451. DOI:10.1007/s00603-006-0109-4.
[7] Gong Q M, Zhao J. Development of a rock mass characteristics model for TBM penetration rate prediction[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2009, 46(1): 8-18. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.03.003.
[8] Espallargas N, Jakobsen P D, Langmaack L, et al. Influence of corrosion on the abrasion of cutter steels used in TBM tunnelling[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2015, 48(1): 261-275. DOI:10.1007/s00603-014-0552-6.
[9] 万治昌,沙明元,周雁领.盘形滚刀的使用与研究(2)——TB880E型掘进机在秦岭隧道施工中的应用[J].现代隧道技术,2002,39(6):1-12. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6582.2002.06.001.
Wan Zhichang, Sha Mingyuan, Zhou Yanling. Study on disk cutters for hard rock—application of TB880E TBM in Qinling Tunnel [J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2002, 39(6): 1-12. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6582.2002.06.001. (in Chinese)
[10] 万治昌,沙明元,周雁领.盘形滚刀的使用与研究(1)——TB880E型掘进机在秦岭隧道施工中的应用[J].现代隧道技术,2002,39(5):1-11. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6582.2002.05.001.
Wan Zhichang, Sha Mingyuan, Zhou Yanling. Study on disk cutters for hard rock—application of TB880E TBM in Qinling Tunnel[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2002, 39(5): 1-11. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6582.2002.05.001. (in Chinese)
[11] 张厚美.TBM的掘进性能数值仿真研究[J].隧道建设,2006,26(z2):1-7. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-741X.2006.z2.001.
Zhang Houmei. Study on numerical simulations of performance of tunnel boring machines TBM[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2006, 26(z2): 1-7. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-741X.2006.z2.001. (in Chinese)
[12] 张照煌,户秀妹,孟亮,等.盘形滚刀破岩效能理论分析[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2012,20(z1):199-206. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-0930.2012.s1.021.
Zhang Zhaohuang, Hu Xiumei, Meng Liang, et al. Theoretical analysis of efficiency of rock breaking by disc cutters[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2012, 20(z1): 199-206. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-0930.2012.s1.021. (in Chinese)
[13] 吴元.TBM边缘滚刀破岩特性及其布置研究[D].长沙:中南大学机电工程学院,2013.
[14] Gharahbagh E A, Mooney M A, Frank G, et al. Periodic inspection of gauge cutter wear on EPB TBMs using cone penetration testing[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 38: 279-286. DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2013.07.013.
[15] 沈斌.TBM边缘滚刀组合优化布置研究[D].长沙:中南大学机电工程学院,2014.
[16] Huo J, Wang W, Sun W, et al. The multi-stage rock fragmentation load prediction model of tunnel boring machine cutter group based on dense core theory[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 90(1): 277-289. DOI:10.1007/s00170-016-9375-9.
[17] 夏毅敏,吴元,郭金成,等.TBM边缘滚刀破岩机理的数值研究[J].煤炭学报,2014,39(1):172-178. DOI:10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2013.0177.
Xia Yimin, Wu Yuan, Guo Jincheng, et al. Numerical simulation of rock-breaking mechanism by gage disc cutter of TBM[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(1): 172-178. DOI:10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2013.0177. (in Chinese)
[18] Hassanpour J, Rostami J, Azali S T, et al. Introduction of an empirical TBM cutter wear prediction model for pyroclastic and mafic igneous rocks; a case history of Karaj water conveyance tunnel, Iran[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 43: 222-231. DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2014.05.007.
[19] 吴元,夏毅敏,郭金成,等.TBM边缘滚刀关键参数对破岩效率影响规律研究[J].现代隧道技术,2015,52(1):119-126. DOI:10.13807/j.cnki.mtt.2015.01.017.
Wu Yuan, Xia Yimin, Guo Jincheng, et al. Influence of key parameters of a TBM gauge disc cutter on rock-breaking efficiency[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2015, 52(1): 119-126. DOI:10.13807/j.cnki.mtt.2015.01.017. (in Chinese)
[20] Ma H, Yin L, Ji H. Numerical study of the effect of confining stress on rock fragmentation by TBM cutters[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(6): 1021-1033. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.05.002.
[21] Teale R. The concept of specific energy in rock drilling[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1965, 2(1): 57-73. DOI:10.1016/0148-9062(65)90022-7.
[22] 夏毅敏,张旭辉,谭青,等.不同围压下刀宽对滚刀破岩特性的影响规律[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2017,25(3):636-645. DOI:10.16058/j.issn.1005-0930.2017.03.019.
Xia Yimin, Zhang Xuhui, Tan Qing, et al. Influence of rock breaking characteristics with disc cutter width under different confining pressure[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2017, 25(3): 636-645. DOI:10.16058/j.issn.1005-0930.2017.03.019. (in Chinese)
[23] 李博.滚刀破岩过程的离散元模拟及试验研究[D].上海:同济大学土木工程学院,2013.
[24] 夏毅敏,吴才章,顾健健.不同地应力下TBM盘形滚刀破岩特性[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,47(2):450-458. DOI:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2016.02.014.
Xia Yimin, Wu Caizhang, Gu Jianjian, et al. Mechanical characteristics of TBM disc cutter under the initial stress[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2016, 47(2): 450-458. DOI:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2016.02.014. (in Chinese)

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2017-04-16.
作者简介: 薛亚东(1971—),男,博士,副教授,博士生导师,yadongxue@126.com.
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41072206)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(0200219209).
引用本文: 薛亚东,杨文亮,黄宏伟,等.围压条件下TBM边缘滚刀破岩模式[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,47(6):1239-1247. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.06.025.
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-11-20