[1]黄晓慧,何娟.考虑碳排放和非均衡竞争环境的供应链策略[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,51(3):542-550.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2021.03.025]
 Huang Xiaohui,He Juan.Supply chain strategy considering carbon emission and unbalanced competition[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2021,51(3):542-550.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2021.03.025]
点击复制

考虑碳排放和非均衡竞争环境的供应链策略()
分享到:

《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-0505/CN:32-1178/N]

卷:
51
期数:
2021年第3期
页码:
542-550
栏目:
经济与管理
出版日期:
2021-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Supply chain strategy considering carbon emission and unbalanced competition
作者:
黄晓慧何娟
西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院, 成都 611756
Author(s):
Huang Xiaohui He Juan
School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
关键词:
碳减排 资金约束 双敏感需求 非均衡竞争
Keywords:
carbon emission reduction financial constraints dual sensitivity demand unbalanced competition
分类号:
F274
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2021.03.025
摘要:
针对企业面临资金约束和碳减排的双重压力,从供应商的横向非均衡竞争出发,考虑价格和碳减排的双敏感需求特征,建立零售商主导的Stackelberg博弈模型,给出不同竞争状态下均衡决策.探究企业异质性特征传递带来的连锁反应,刻画生产成本、碳减排效率和资金水平对供应链成员决策的作用机理,并验证零售商的定价策略及合作供应商选择策略.研究发现,供应商较低的生产成本可激励其加大减排力度,实现利润增长,碳减排效率优化则通过高减排投入助供应商拓展市场以获得竞争优势,而资金环境改善对供应商的影响取决于其原资金约束程度.从零售商视角,应选择与水平相近的2个竞争供应商同时合作,并制定差异化定价策略.
Abstract:
Companies are often faced with the dual pressure of capital constraints and carbon reduction. Starting from the horizontal unbalanced competition of suppliers, and considering the double sensitive demand characteristics of price and carbon emission reduction, a Stackelberg game model dominated by the retailer was established. The chain reaction brought by the transmission of enterprise heterogeneity characteristics was given by equilibrium decisions under different competitive conditions. The effect mechanisms of production cost, carbon emission reduction efficiency and capital level on the decision of supply chain members were described, and the retailer’s pricing strategy and cooperative supplier selection strategy were verified. The results show that the lower production cost can encourage the supplier to increase emission reduction effort and achieve profit growth. The optimization of carbon reduction efficiency can help the supplier expand the market through high carbon reduction investment to obtain a competitive advantage, while the impact of the capital environment depends on the degree of original funding constraints. From the perspective of the retailer, he/she should cooperate with two competing suppliers with similar levels, and formulate a differentiated pricing strategy.

参考文献/References:

[1] Fysikopoulos A, Pastras G, Alexopoulos T, et al. On a generalized approach to manufacturing energy efficiency[J].The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2014, 73(9/10/11/12): 1437-1452. DOI:10.1007/s00170-014-5818-3.
[2] Chander P, Muthukrishnan S. Green consumerism and pollution control[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2015, 114: 27-35. DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.013.
[3] Paksoy T, �D6;zceylan E. Environmentally conscious optimization of supply chain networks[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2014, 65(6): 855-872. DOI:10.1057/jors.2012.95.
[4] Fang Y E, Shou B Y. Managing supply uncertainty under supply chain Cournot competition[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 243(1): 156-176. DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.038.
[5] Gao J. Price strategy of competitive supply chain based on bank financing[J].Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 2020: 1-13. DOI:10.1155/2020/3272348.
[6] Kleber R, Reimann M, Souza G C, et al. Two-sided competition with vertical differentiation in both acquisition and sales in remanufacturing[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 284(2): 572-587. DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.012.
[7] Lin M, Wu R H. Production cost heterogeneity in the circular City model[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2015, 43(4): 401-404. DOI:10.1016/j.orl.2015.04.010.
[8] Chevalier-Roignant B, Flath C M, Kort P M, et al. Capacity investment choices under cost heterogeneity and output flexibility in oligopoly[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2021, 290(3): 1154-1173. DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.046.
[9] Jin Y, Hu Q, Kim S W, et al. Supplier development and integration in competitive supply chains[J].Production and Operations Management, 2019, 28(5): 1256-1271. DOI:10.1111/poms.12984.
[10] 于丽萍,李莉杰.零售商风险规避下差异化渠道的三层供应链协调[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2021,42(2):282-289.
  Yu L P, Li L J. Three-tier supply chain coordination based on the differentiated channels under the risk aversion of retailers[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2021, 42(2): 282-289.(in Chinese)
[11] Bonfiglioli A, Crinò R, Gancia G. Trade, finance, and endogenous firm heterogeneity[J].Journal of the European Economic Association, 2019, 17(1): 79-130. DOI:10.1093/jeea/jvx047.
[12] Ottonello P, Winberry T. Financial heterogeneity and the investment channel of monetary policy[J]. Econometrica, 2020, 88(6): 2473-2502. DOI:10.3982/ECTA15949.
[13] Rothschild R. Competitive behaviour in chain-linked markets[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1982, 31(1/2): 57. DOI:10.2307/2098004.
[14] Ma Z W, Prasad A, Sethi S P. Strategic remanufacturing under competition[J].Review of Marketing Science, 2019, 16(1): 85-107. DOI:10.1515/roms-2019-0019.
[15] Wu T, Zhang L G, Ge T. Managing financing risk in capacity investment under green supply chain competition[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 143: 37-44. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.005.
[16] Qin J J, Zhao Y H, Xia L J. Carbon emission reduction with capital constraint under greening financing and cost sharing contract[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(4): 750. DOI:10.3390/ijerph15040750.
[17] Wang J, Cheng X X, Zhang S H. Low carbon distribution channel coordination with a capital-constrained retailer[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2018, 2018: 1-13. DOI:10.1155/2018/9579348.
[18] 曹二保,胡畔.基于时间偏好不一致的供应链碳减排动态投资决策研究[J].软科学,2018,32(3):77-83. DOI:10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2018.03.17.
Cao E B, Hu P. Research on the dynamic investment decision for carbon emission reduction in supply chain based on time-inconsistent preference[J]. Soft Science, 2018, 32(3): 77-83. DOI:10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2018.03.17. (in Chinese)
[19] Zhang L H, Zhou H, Liu Y Y, et al. The optimal carbon emission reduction and prices with cap and trade mechanism and competition[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(11): 2570. DOI:10.3390/ijerph15112570.
[20] Meng X G, Yao Z, Nie J J, et al. Low-carbon product selection with carbon tax and competition: Effects of the power structure[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 200: 224-230. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.029.
[21] Chen X, Luo Z, Wang X J. Impact of efficiency, investment, and competition on low carbon manufacturing[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 143: 388-400. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.095.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2020-12-29.
作者简介: 黄晓慧(1992—),女,博士生; 何娟(联系人),女,博士,教授,博士生导师,hejunlin93@163.com.
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71873111)、教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目(18YJAZH024).
引用本文: 黄晓慧,何娟.考虑碳排放和非均衡竞争环境的供应链策略[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,51(3):542-550. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2021.03.025.
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-05-20