[1]王曦.基于组合评价方法的城市地下空间详细规划方案评价[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,44(5):1072-1077.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2014.05.035]
 Wang Xi,Liu Songyu.Evaluation for urban underground space detailed planning scheme based on combined evaluation method[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2014,44(5):1072-1077.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2014.05.035]
点击复制

基于组合评价方法的城市地下空间详细规划方案评价()
分享到:

《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-0505/CN:32-1178/N]

卷:
44
期数:
2014年第5期
页码:
1072-1077
栏目:
建筑学
出版日期:
2014-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation for urban underground space detailed planning scheme based on combined evaluation method
作者:
王曦1 2刘松玉1
1东南大学交通学院, 南京210096; 2无锡市公共工程建设中心, 无锡214031
Author(s):
Wang Xi1 2 Liu Songyu1
1School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
2Wuxi Urban Public Projects Construction Center, Wuxi 214031, China
关键词:
城市地下空间详细规划 方案评价 评价指标体系 熵值法 层次分析法
Keywords:
urban underground space detailed planning evaluation for scheme evaluation index system entropy method analytic hierarchy process(AHP)
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2014.05.035
摘要:
为了分析评价和优化改进规划方案,建立了以功能耦合度为评价目标的城市地下空间详细规划方案评价方法体系.从功能类型、开发规模、空间布局以及相互联系4个方面建立了3层次11项底层指标的城市地下空间详细规划方案评价指标体系,提出了地下空间功能类型多样性、地下空间容积率、地下空间开发强度一致性等评价指标,并在指标设计中采用了Shannon-Weaver指数、变异系数等数学方法.同时还提出了基于层次分析法与熵值法组合权重赋值方法的综合评价方法.最后以无锡市城市地下空间详细规划为实例进行分析评价,评价结果表明,该方法能反映技术方案样本的特征差异,可有效评价方案的合理性.
Abstract:
The evaluation system for urban underground space detailed planning is built to analyze and improve the planning scheme, the target of which is based on the function coupling degree. First, the detailed planning evaluation index system is established from four aspects: the function types, the scale and quantity of development, the spatial arrangement and the intercommunication, which includes 3 levels and 11 underlying indices. The evaluation indices for underground space such as the diversity of functional type, the volume ratio, and the consistency of development intensity are put forward. The Shannon-Weaver index and the coefficient of variation are applied to index design. Then the comprehensive evaluation method is obtained, which is based on analytic hierarchy process(AHP)and entropy method combining weight assignment for evaluation indices. Finally, the urban underground space detailed planning cases of Wuxi city are analyzed and evaluated. The evaluation results show that the proposed method can reflect the differences in scheme samples, and evaluate scheme rationality effectively.

参考文献/References:

[1] 邵继中,王海丰.中国地下空间规划现状与趋势[J].现代城市研究,2013(1):87-93.
  Shao Jizhong, Wang Haifeng. The current situation and tendency of underground space planning in China [J]. Modern Urban Research, 2013(1):87-93.(in Chinese)
[2] 孔令曦,沈荣芳.城市地下空间发展可持续性评价[J].自然灾害学报,2007,16(1):119-122.
  Kong Lingxi, Shen Rongfang. Evaluation of sustainability for development of underground space in urban [J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2007, 16(1):119-122.(in Chinese)
[3] 张弛,姜芸.成都市地下空间开发规划评价研究[J].四川建筑,2008, 28(1):24-26,29.
  Zhang Chi, Jiang Yun. Research on evaluation of urban underground space development plan in Chengdu [J]. Sichuan Architecture, 2008, 28(1):24-26,29.(in Chinese)
[4] 尹玫,芮易,朱合华,等.地下空间示范工程的综合评价[J].地下空间与工程学报,2010, 6(2):219-223,259.
  Yin Mei, Rui Yi, Zhu Hehua, et al. Comprehensive evaluation for underground demonstration project [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2010, 6(2):219-223,259.(in Chinese)
[5] 金磊,柳昆,彭芳乐.城市轨道交通枢纽的地下空间综合体评价方法[J].地下空间与工程学报,2010, 6(S1):1370-1375.
  Jin Lei, Liu Kun, Peng Fangle. Evaluating method of underground complex in urban rail transit hub area [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2010, 6(S1):1370-1375.(in Chinese)
[6] 罗海玲.城市地下市政综合管廊建设技术经济评价体系及规划标准研究[D].北京:北京建筑工程学院环境与能源工程学院,2011.
[7] 王波. 城市地下空间开发利用问题的探索与实践[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院,2013.
[8] 王曦,刘松玉.城市地下空间的规划分类标准研究[J].现代城市研究,2014(5):43-49.
  Wang Xi, Liu Songyu. Research on the criterion of planning classification for urban underground space [J]. Modern Urban Research,2014(5):43-49.(in Chinese)
[9] 储金龙.城市空间形态定量分析研究[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2007:42-43.
[10] 王明涛.多指标综合评价中权系数确定的一种综合分析方法[J].系统工程,1999, 17(2):56-61.
  Wang Mingtao. A comprehensive analysis method on determining the coefficients in multi index evaluation [J]. System Engineering, 1999, 17(2): 56-61.(in Chinese)
[11] 深圳市电子院设计有限公司,无锡市建筑设计研究院有限公司.无锡万达商业广场修建性详细规划[R]. 深圳:深圳市电子院设计有限公司,2007.
[12] 深圳市建筑科学研究院有限公司.无锡太湖新城金融商务第一街区修建性详细规划[R]. 深圳:深圳市建筑科学研究院有限公司,2009.
[13] 深圳建筑设计研究总院有限公司,中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,北京城建设计研究总院有限公司.无锡地铁1号线雪浪停车场上盖配套设施项目初步设计[R]. 深圳:深圳建筑设计研究总院有限公司,2010.

相似文献/References:

[1]卢凯,荆彬彬,吴焕,等.基于集对分析的干道绿波协调控制方案评价方法[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,45(3):606.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2015.03.034]
 Lu Kai,Jing Binbin,Wu Huan,et al.Evaluation method of arterial green wave coordinated control scheme based on set pair analysis[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2015,45(5):606.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2015.03.034]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2013-12-10.
作者简介: 王曦(1978—),男,博士生;刘松玉(联系人),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,liusy@seu.edu.cn.
引用本文: 王曦,刘松玉.基于组合评价方法的城市地下空间详细规划方案评价[J].东南大学学报:自然科学版,2014,44(5):1072-1077. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2014.05.035]
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-09-20