[1]黄亮,郭彤,徐伟杰.实时混合模拟误差的理论分析及试验验证[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,46(5):1045-1050.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2016.05.025]
 Huang Liang,Guo Tong,Xu Weijie.Theoretical analysis and experimental verification of errors in real-time hybrid simulation[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2016,46(5):1045-1050.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2016.05.025]
点击复制

实时混合模拟误差的理论分析及试验验证()
分享到:

《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-0505/CN:32-1178/N]

卷:
46
期数:
2016年第5期
页码:
1045-1050
栏目:
土木工程
出版日期:
2016-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Theoretical analysis and experimental verification of errors in real-time hybrid simulation
作者:
黄亮郭彤徐伟杰
东南大学混凝土及预应力混凝土结构教育部重点试验室, 南京210096
Author(s):
Huang Liang Guo Tong Xu Weijie
Key Laboratory of Concrete and Pre-stressed Concrete Structures of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
关键词:
实时混合模拟 时滞微分方程 误差分析 幅值比率误差 时滞
Keywords:
real-time hybrid simulation time delay differential equation error analysis amplitude ratio error time delay
分类号:
TU317.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2016.05.025
摘要:
为研究实时混合模拟中幅值比率误差和时滞对试验结果的影响,选用弹簧作为试验子结构进行研究,观测和分析了测量位移与计算位移之间的微小误差.假定在试验过程中幅值比率误差和时滞处处相等,采用时滞微分方程建立了实时混合模拟的数学模型,给出了微时滞下自由振动和简谐振动的近似解.结果表明,理论分析结果与试验结果较为相似,说明所提数学模型具有合理性和准确性.误差会导致作用在试验子结构上的外力失真,并影响了数值子结构的位移峰值和稳态振幅.理论分析结果与试验结果之间的微小差异主要受假设简化、测量噪声、累积误差等因素的影响.
Abstract:
To investigate the influences of the amplitude ratio error and the time delay on the results in real-time hybrid simulation(RTHS), an experiment, taking a spring as the experimental substructure, was conducted and the micro errors between the measured displacements and the calculated displacements were observed and analyzed. Assuming that the amplitude ratio error and the time delay were constant in the experiment, a RTHS mathematical model was developed by using the time delay differential equations, and the approximate solutions of the micro time delay formulas in free and simple harmonic vibration were derived, respectively. The results show that theoretical results and the experimental results are similar, proving the rationality and the accuracy of the mathematical model. The errors distort the force acting on the experimental substructure, and affect the peak displacement and the steady amplitude of the numerical substructure. The micro errors between the theoretical results and the experimental results are affected by simplified assumption, measured noise, accumulative errors and so on.

参考文献/References:

[1] Nakashima M, Kato H, Takaoka E. Development of real-time pseudo dynamic testing[J]. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn, 1992, 21(1):79-92. DOI:10.1002/eqe.4290210106.
[2] 陈永盛, 吴斌, 王贞, 等. 基于Simulink的混合试验系统及其验证[J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(7): 18-23. DOI:10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.07.004.
  Chen Yongsheng, Wu Bin, Wang Zhen, et al. Simulation and validation of a hybrid testing system with Simulink[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(7): 18-23. DOI:10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.07.004.(in Chinese)
[3] Horiuchi T, Inoue M, Konno T, et al. Real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber[J]. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn, 1999, 28(10):1121-1141. DOI:10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199910)28:10<1121::aid-eqe858>3.3.co;2-f.
[4] Chung J, Hulbert G M. A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: The generalized-α method[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1993,60(2):371-375. DOI:10.1115/1.2900803.
[5] Guo T, Chen C, Xu W, et al. A frequency response analysis approach for quantitative assessment of actuator tracking for real-time hybrid simulation[J]. Smart Mater Struct, 2014, 23(4):045042. DOI:10.1088/0964-1726/23/4/045042.
[6] Mercan O. Analytical and experimental studies on large scale real-time pseudo dynamic testing[D]. Bethlehem, PA, USA: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Lehigh University, 2007.
[7] Clough R W, Penzien J. Dynamics of structures[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975: 9-32.
[8] Carrion J, Spencer B F. Real-time hybrid testing using model-based delay compensation[J]. Smart Structures and Systems, 2006,4(6):809-828. Taibei,China,2006: 299.
[9] 内藤敏机,原惟行,日野义之, 等. 时滞微分方程——泛函微分方程引论[M]. 马万彪,等译. 北京:科学出版社, 2013:21-27.
[10] 魏骏杰,王洪滨,蒋卫华. 时滞微分方程的分支理论及应用[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2012:22-34.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐伟杰,郭彤,陈城.实时混合模拟频域评价方法的物理意义[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,43(5):923.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2013.05.004]
 Xu Weijie,Guo Tong,Chen Cheng.Physical significance of frequency-domain based evaluation method for real-time hybrid simulation[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2013,43(5):923.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2013.05.004]
[2]徐伟杰,陈城,陈梦晖,等.回归法在实时混合模拟数值子结构不确定性分析中的应用[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2020,50(1):96.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2020.01.013]
 Xu Weijie,Chen Cheng,Chen Menghui,et al.Application of regression method in uncertainty analysis for numerical substructure in real-time hybrid simulation[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2020,50(5):96.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2020.01.013]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2015-12-28.
作者简介: 黄亮(1986—),男,博士生; 郭彤(联系人),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,guotong@seu.edu.cn.
基金项目: 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(1105007002).
引用本文: 黄亮,郭彤,徐伟杰.实时混合模拟误差的理论分析及试验验证[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,46(5):1045-1050. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2016.05.025.
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-09-20