[1]于建兵,郭正兴.钢绞线锚入式预制装配混凝土框架节点抗震试验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,47(4):760-765.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.04.021]
 Yu Jianbing,Guo Zhengxing.Seismic experimental study on strands anchored precast concrete frame connections[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2017,47(4):760-765.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.04.021]
点击复制

钢绞线锚入式预制装配混凝土框架节点抗震试验研究()
分享到:

《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-0505/CN:32-1178/N]

卷:
47
期数:
2017年第4期
页码:
760-765
栏目:
土木工程
出版日期:
2017-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Seismic experimental study on strands anchored precast concrete frame connections
作者:
于建兵12郭正兴2
1扬州大学建筑科学与工程学院, 扬州 225127; 2东南大学土木工程学院, 南京 210096
Author(s):
Yu Jianbing12 Guo Zhengxing2
1College of Civil Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China
2School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
关键词:
预制装配 低周反复荷载试验 滞回性能 耗能能力 抗震性能
Keywords:
precast assembly low-cycle reversed loading test hysteresis performance dissipation capacity seismic performance
分类号:
TU317.1;TU398.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.04.021
摘要:
为了系统研究钢绞线锚入式预制装配混凝土框架节点的抗震性能,对8个预制节点和1个现浇节点的足尺比例试件进行了低周反复荷载试验研究,探讨了预制装配节点的破坏形态、滞回性能、刚度退化以及耗能能力.试验结果表明,在节点核心区设置附加钢筋,能够有效提高节点的承载能力和变形能力,同时可以实现梁端塑性铰外移.加载前期,预制装配节点的滞回环面积较现浇节点小,但随着荷载的继续施加,预制节点的滞回环面积与现浇节点基本相当.这反映了节点的耗能能力在加载前期较现浇节点差,但后期与现浇节点基本相当甚至超过现浇节点.通过对比以上抗震性能发现,钢绞线锚入式预制装配混凝土框架节点能够满足抗震规范的要求.
Abstract:
In order to study the seismic performance of precast concrete connections of anchored prestressing strands in frame, the low-cycle reversed loading test was conducted on eight full-scale precast connections and one cast-in-place connection. The failure mechanism, hysteretic behavior, stiffness degradation and energy dissipation capacity of the precast connections were discussed. The experimental results show that additional reinforcement arranged in the core region can effectively enhance the bearing capacity and deformation capacity of the connections, while the plastic hinge of the beam can also be moved toward outside. In pre-loading, the hysteresis loop area of precast connections is smaller than that of cast-in-place connection, but as the loading continued to be applied, the hysteresis loop area of precast connections is almost equal to that of cast-in-place connection. It can be concluded that the energy dissipation capacity of precast connections is poorer than that of cast-in-place connection in the preliminary stage, however, the energy consumption is equal to or even more than the cast-in-place connection in the later stage. Through the comparison of the above seismic performance, it is found that the precast concrete connection of anchored prestressing strands in the frame can satisfy the requirements of the seismic code.

参考文献/References:

[1] Ataei A, Bradford M A, Liu X P. Experimental study of flush end plate beam-to-column composite joints with precast slabs and deconstructable bolted shear connectors[J]. Structures, 2016, 7: 43-58. DOI:10.1016/j.istruc.2016.05.002.
[2] Guan D Z, Guo Z X, Xiao Q D, et al. Experimental study of a new beam-to-column connection for precast concrete frames under reversal cyclic loading[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2016, 19(3): 529-545. DOI:10.1177/1369433216630122.
[3] Priestley M J N, MacRae G A. Seismic tests of precast beam-to-column joint subassemblages with unbonded tendons[J]. PCI Journal, 1996, 41(1): 64-81. DOI:10.15554/pcij.01011996.64.81.
[4] Yuksel E, Karadogan H F, Bal(·overI)E, et al. Seismic behavior of two exterior beam-column connections made of normal-strength concrete developed for precast construction[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 99: 157-172. DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.044.
[5] Loo Y C, Yao B Z. Static and repeated load tests on precast concrete beam-to-column connections[J]. PCI Journal, 1995, 40(2): 106-115. DOI:10.15554/pcij.03011995.106.115.
[6] Alcocer S M, Carranza R, Perez-Navarrete D, et al. Seismic tests of beam-to-column connections in a precast concrete frame[J]. PCI Journal, 2002, 47(3): 70-89. DOI:10.15554/pcij.05012002.70.89.
[7] Khoo J-H, Li, B, Yip W-K. Tests on precast concrete frames with connections constructed away from column faces[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2006, 103(1): 18-27.
[8] Xue W C, Zhang B. Seismic behavior of hybrid concrete beam-column connections with composite beams and cast-in-place columns[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2014, 111(3): 617-627. DOI:10.14359/51686577.
[9] 柳炳康,宋满荣,黄慎江,等.三层预压装配式预应力混凝土框架抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2011,32(9):99-106.
  Liu Bingkang, Song Manrong, Huang Shenjiang, et al. Experimental study on seismic performance of three story post-tensioned precast RC frame[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2011, 32(9): 99-106.(in Chinese)
[10] 于建兵,郭正兴,管东芝,等.新型预制装配框架混凝土梁柱节点抗震性能研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,42(7):42-47. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-2974.2015.07.007.
Yu Jianbing, Guo Zhengxing, Guan Dongzhi, et al. Research on seismic behavior of a new style precast concrete beam-to column connection[J]. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences), 2015, 42(7): 42-47. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-2974.2015.07.007. (in Chinese)
[11] 朱张峰,郭正兴.预制装配式剪力墙结构节点抗震性能试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2012,45(1):69-76.
  Zhu Zhangfeng, Guo Zhengxing. Seismic test and analysis of joints of new precast concrete shear wall structure[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(1): 69-76.(In Chinese)
[12] 中国建筑科学研究院.GB 50011—2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
[13] 中国建筑科学研究院.JGJ 101—1996建筑抗震试验方法规程[S].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,1997.
[14] 程万鹏,宋玉普,王军.预制装配式部分钢骨混凝土框架梁柱中节点抗震性能试验研究[J].大连理工大学学报,2015,55(2):171-178. DOI:10.7511/dllgxb201502008.
Cheng Wanpeng, Song Yupu, Wang Jun. Experimental study of seismic performance for interior beam-column joints of precast and discontinuous steel reinforced concrete frames[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2015, 55(2): 171-178. DOI:10.7511/dllgxb201502008. (in Chinese)
[15] 黄远,张锐,朱正庚.现浇柱预制梁混凝土框架结构抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2015,36(1):44-50.
  Huang Yuan, Zhang Rui, Zhu Zhenggeng. Experimental study on seismic performance of frame with precast beams and cast in-place columns[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2015, 36(1): 44-50.(in Chinese)

相似文献/References:

[1]王曙光,蓝宗建.框架结构消能减震的试验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2001,31(4):58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2001.04.014]
 Wang Shuguang,Liu Weiqing,Lan Zongjian.Experimental Study on Seismic Control and Energy Dissipation of RC Frame Structures[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2001,31(4):58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2001.04.014]
[2]薛伟辰,杨佳林,董年才,等.低周反复荷载下预制混凝土夹心保温剪力墙的试验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,43(5):1104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2013.05.033]
 Xue Weichen,Yang Jialin,Dong Niancai,et al.Experimental study on precast concrete sandwich insulation shear walls under low reversed cyclic loading[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2013,43(4):1104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2013.05.033]
[3]董宏英,张力嘉,曹万林,等.密柱-钢板深梁结构抗震性能试验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,45(3):550.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2015.03.024]
 Dong Hongying,Zhang Lijia,Cao Wanlin,et al.Experimental study on seismic behavior of structure with dense columns-deep steel plate beams[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2015,45(4):550.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2015.03.024]
[4]马军卫,潘金龙,莫创,等.半装配式框架-剪力墙结构抗震性能试验[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,47(2):313.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.02.019]
 Ma Junwei,Pan Jinlong,Mo Chuang,et al.Seismic performance experiments on semi-precast shear wall-frame structures[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2017,47(4):313.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.02.019]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2016-12-31.
作者简介: 于建兵(1983—),男,博士,讲师,jlyujianbing2008@163.com.
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划资助项目(2016YFC0701703).
引用本文: 于建兵,郭正兴.钢绞线锚入式预制装配混凝土框架节点抗震试验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,47(4):760-765. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.04.021.
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-07-20