[1]杜广印,罗涛,程远,等.基于CPTU土类指数的标贯值液化判别[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,47(4):812-817.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.04.028]
 Du Guangyin,Luo Tao,Cheng Yuan,et al.Liquefaction assessment using standard penetration test value based on CPTU soil behavior type index[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2017,47(4):812-817.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.04.028]
点击复制

基于CPTU土类指数的标贯值液化判别()
分享到:

《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-0505/CN:32-1178/N]

卷:
47
期数:
2017年第4期
页码:
812-817
栏目:
土木工程
出版日期:
2017-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Liquefaction assessment using standard penetration test value based on CPTU soil behavior type index
作者:
杜广印12罗涛12程远3潘皇宋12
1东南大学岩土工程研究所, 南京 210096; 2江苏省城市地下工程与环境安全重点实验室, 南京 210096; 3苏州市轨道交通集团有限公司, 苏州 215004
Author(s):
Du Guangyin12 Luo Tao12 Cheng Yuan3 Pan Huangsong12
1Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
2Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering and Environmental Safety, Nanjing 210096, China
3Suzhou Rail Transit Group Co., Ltd, Suzhou 215004, China
关键词:
液化地基 孔压静力触探 标贯值 土类指数
Keywords:
liquefiable foundation piezocone penetration test(CPTU) standard penetration test value soil behavior type index
分类号:
TU413
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.04.028
摘要:
为提高可液化地基液化判别的准确性,依托宿新高速公路共振法加固可液化地基项目,对共振法处理后的液化地基进行CPTU试验和SPT试验.对CPTU试验得到的土类指数Ic和SPT试验得到的标贯值N63.5进行处理分析.结果表明,饱和砂土和粉土的标贯值N63.5是土类指数Ic的一次函数(N63.5=-18.8Ic+52.0),即土类指数越大,土性越接近黏性,标贯值越小.基于N63.5Ic的拟合关系式提出一种新型液化判别方法,即根据标贯值参照《建筑抗震设计规范》进行饱和砂土和粉土地基的液化判别,其中标贯值根据Ic计算获得,Ic则通过CPTU试验获取.与规范中SPT判别法相比,该方法可以提供连续的标贯值参数,与基于CPT的周期阻力比法相比,该方法计算简单.
Abstract:
In order to increase the accuracy of liquefaction assessment on liquefiable foundation, the liquefiable foundation of the Suqian-Xinyi highway was treated by the resonant compaction method, and piezocone penetration test(CPTU)and standard penetration test(SPT)were carried out on the liquefiable foundation. The soil behavior type index(Ic)obtained from CPTU and the standard penetration test index(N63.5)obtained from SPT are analyzed. The results show that N63.5 of saturated sands and silts is a linear function of Ic(N63.5=-18.8Ic+52.0). The larger the Ic, the smaller the N63.5 will be, and the soil is more close to clay. Based on the fitting relationship between N63.5 and Ic, a new liquefaction discrimination method is established. The liquefaction of saturated sands and silts foundation can be assessed by using N63.5 based on the Code of Seismic Design of Building. N63.5 is expressed by single Ic and Ic is acquired from CPTU. Compared with the SPT assessment method proposed in the code, this method can provide continuous standard penetration test value. Compared with the cyclic resistance ratio method based on cone penetration test, the calculation of the method is very simple.

参考文献/References:

[1] Seed H B, Idriss I M. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1971, 97(9): 1249-1273.
[2] 中华人民共和国建设部.GB 50011—2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
[3] Jefferies M G, Davies M P. Soil classification by the cone penetration test: Discussion[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1991, 28(1): 173-176. DOI:10.1139/t91-023.
[4] Robertson P K. Interpretation of cone penetration tests—a unified approach[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46(11): 1337-1355. DOI:10.1139/t09-065.
[5] 刘松玉,蔡国军,邹海峰.基于CPTU的中国实用土分类方法研究[J].岩土工程学报,2013(10):1765-1776.
  Liu Songyu, Cai Guojun, Zou Haifeng. Research on Chinese practical soil classification method based on CPTU[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013(10): 1765-1776.(in Chinese)
[6] 邹海峰,刘松玉,蔡国军,等.基于电阻率CPTU的饱和砂土液化势评价研究[J].岩土工程学报,2013,35(7):1280-1288.
  Zou Haifeng, Liu Songyu, Cai Guojun, et al. Research on the liquefaction evaluation of saturated sand based on resistivity CPTU[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(7): 1280-1288.(in Chinese)
[7] Robertson P K, Campanella R G, Wightman A. SPT-CPT correlations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1983, 109(11): 1449-1459. DOI:10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1983)109:11(1449).
[8] Robertson P K, Campanella R G, Gillespie D, et al. Use of piezometer cone data [C]//Proceedings of the ASCE Specialty Conference In Situ ’86: Use of in Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering. Blacksburg, USA, 1986.
[9] 刘松玉,蔡国军,童立元.现代多功能CPTU技术理论与工程应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2013:239.
[10] 廖先斌,郭晓勇,杜宇.英标和国标标贯设备试验结果相关性分析[J].岩土力学,2013,34(1):143-147.
  Liao Xianbin, Guo Xiaoyong, Du Yu. Correlation analysis of standard penetration test results on British and Chinese standard equipments[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(1): 143-147.(in Chinese)
[11] Osman M A, El Fatih O A. Evaluation of cone penetration test(CPT)classification methods for some local soils[J/OL]. Journal of Building and Road Research, 2016, 5(1): http://ejournals.uofk.edu/index.php/JBRR/article/view/669.
[12] Eslami A, Alimirzaei M, Aflaki E, et al. Deltaic soil behavior classification using CPTU records—Proposed approach and applied to fifty-four case histories[J]. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2017, 35(1): 62-79. DOI:10.1080/1064119x.2015.1102185.
[13] Robertson P K. Cone penetration test(CPT)-based soil behaviour type(SBT)classification system—An update[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2016, 53(12): 1910-1927. DOI:10.1139/cgj-2016-0044.
[14] Shahri A A, Malehmir A, Juhlin C. Soil classification analysis based on piezocone penetration test data—A case study from a quick-clay landslide site in southwestern Sweden[J]. Engineering Geology, 2015, 189: 32-47. DOI:10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.022.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2017-01-22.
作者简介: 杜广印(1964—),男,博士,副教授,博士生导师,guangyin@seu.edu.cn.
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41372308)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目和江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目(SJLX15_0060)、江苏省自然科学基金资助项目(BK20150279).
引用本文: 杜广印,罗涛,程远,等.基于CPTU土类指数的标贯值液化判别[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,47(4):812-817. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.04.028.
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-07-20