[1]杨辉,郭正兴,尹航,等.高强底筋锚入式预制装配混凝土框架梁柱节点抗震试验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,48(6):979-986.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2018.06.001]
 Yang Hui,Guo Zhengxing,Yin Hang,et al.Experimental study on seismic behavior of precast concrete beam-to-column connections with high-strength hooked beam bottom bars[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2018,48(6):979-986.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2018.06.001]
点击复制

高强底筋锚入式预制装配混凝土框架梁柱节点抗震试验研究()
分享到:

《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-0505/CN:32-1178/N]

卷:
48
期数:
2018年第6期
页码:
979-986
栏目:
土木工程
出版日期:
2018-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Experimental study on seismic behavior of precast concrete beam-to-column connections with high-strength hooked beam bottom bars
作者:
杨辉郭正兴尹航管东芝杨森
东南大学土木工程学院, 南京 210096
Author(s):
Yang Hui Guo Zhengxing Yin Hang Guan Dongzhi Yang Sen
School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
关键词:
梁柱节点 装配式混凝土框架 低周反复试验 高强钢筋
Keywords:
beam-to-column connection precast concrete frame cyclic testing high-strength steel
分类号:
TU375.4;TU317.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2018.06.001
摘要:
为解决传统梁柱节点在预制梁安装时节点区钢筋易发生碰撞的难题,提出了一种高强底筋锚入式预制装配混凝土框架梁柱节点.该节点预制梁下缘纵向受力钢筋采用小直径的HTRB630级高强钢筋,端部直角弯钩锚入节点核心区,因其柔韧性可在节点区自由交错弯折.开展了4个足尺预制试件和1个现浇试件的低周反复荷载试验;对新型节点及可能影响节点性能的相关构造包括键槽内是否增设附加小箍筋、叠合梁顶缘纵向钢筋是否同时采用高强钢筋、键槽内壁粗糙处理方式及预制柱的类型进行了研究.试验结果表明:新型节点抗震性能良好,可以应用于抗震地区;与新型节点基准试件相比,键槽内设置附加小箍筋能够稍增强各项抗震指标,提高幅度5%左右;梁上缘连续纵筋同时采用高强钢筋,强度和耗能能力下降了5%左右;泡泡膜界面粗糙工艺能保证结构的完整性.
Abstract:
A new beam-to-column connection developed for precast concrete moment resisting frames is proposed to avoid reinforcement obstruction in connection regions. Small-diameter HTRB630 high-strength steel bars with hooked anchorages in the joint core are used as the precast beam bottom longitudinal bars, and they can be easily bent due to their flexibility. Four full-scale precast specimens and a monolithic specimen were tested to evaluate the earthquake resistance under reversal cyclic loading. The new beam-to-column connection and other relevant details that may affect the structural performance, including the type of beam top longitudinal bars, height of precast columns, manner of roughening the inner surface of the U-shell and presence or absence of small-diameter stirrups inside the U-shell, were studied. The results show that the proposed connection exhibits good seismic resistance, and thus it can be used in seismic regions. Furthermore, compared with the benchmark precast specimen, the existence of additional stirrups slightly enhances the overall performance by approximately 5%. The use of high-strength steel bars as beam top longitudinal bars further decreases the strength and energy dissipation by approximately 5%. The air bubble film technique in roughening the interface between precast and postcast concrete can ensure the structural integrity.

参考文献/References:

[1] Kurama Y C, Sritharan S, Fleischman R B, et al. Seismic-resistant precast concrete structures: State of the art[J].Journal of Structural Engineering, 2018, 144(4): 03118001. DOI:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001972.
[2] Bull D K, Park R. Seismic resistance of frames incorporating precast prestressed concrete beam shells[J].PCI Journal, 1986, 31(4): 54-93. DOI:10.15554/pcij.07011986.54.93.
[3] Park R. A perspective on the seismic design of precast concrete structures in new Zealand[J]. PCI Journal, 1995, 40(3): 40-60. DOI:10.15554/pcij.05011995.40.60.
[4] Restrepo J I, Park R, Buchanan A H. Tests on connections of earthquake resisting precast reinforced concrete perimeter frames of buildings[J].PCI Journal, 1995, 40(4): 44-61. DOI:10.15554/pcij.07011995.44.61.
[5] 王莉莉. 新型预制PC梁装配整体式框架节点相关技术研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学土木工程学院, 2012.
[6] 管东芝, 郭正兴, 于建兵, 等. 钢绞线锚入式预制砼框架节点构造及试验[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(2): 282-291. DOI:10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.02.012.
Guan Dongzhi, Guo Zhengxing, Yu Jianbing, et al. Structural measures and experimental study of precast concrete joints of anchored prestressing strands in frames[J].Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science), 2016, 50(2): 282-291. DOI:10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.02.012. (in Chinese)
[7] Parastesh H, Hajirasouliha I, Ramezani R. A new ductile moment-resisting connection for precast concrete frames in seismic regions: An experimental investigation[J].Engineering Structures, 2014, 70: 144-157. DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.001.
[8] Ha S S, Kim S H, Lee M S, et al. Performance evaluation of semi precast concrete beam-column connections with U-shaped strands[J].Advances in Structural Engineering, 2014, 17(11): 1585-1600. DOI:10.1260/1369-4332.17.11.1585.
[9] Chen S C, Yan W M, Gao J. Experimental investigation on the seismic performance of large-scale interior beam-column joints with composite slab[J].Advances in Structural Engineering, 2012, 15(7): 1227-1237. DOI:10.1260/1369-4332.15.7.1227.
[10] Im H J, Park H G, Eom T S. Cyclic loading test for reinforced concrete emulated beam-column connection of precast concrete moment frame[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2013, 110(1): 115-125. DOI:10.14359/51684335.
[11] 朱洪进. 预制预应力混凝土装配整体式框架结构(世构体系)节点试验研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学土木工程学院, 2006.
[12] 蔡建国, 冯健, 王赞, 等. 预制预应力混凝土装配整体式框架抗震性能研究[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 48(2): 136-140. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0529-6579.2009.02.027.
Cai Jianguo, Feng Jian, Wang Zan, et al. Seismic behavior of frame comprised of precast prestressed concrete components[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 2009, 48(2): 136-140. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0529-6579.2009.02.027. (in Chinese)
[13] Guan D Z, Jiang C, Guo Z X, et al. Development and seismic behavior of precast concrete beam-to-column connections[J].Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 22(2): 234-256. DOI:10.1080/13632469.2016.1217807.
[14] 张健新, 戎贤, 吴海超. 配置600 MPa级钢筋混凝土框架边节点滞回性能试验研究[J]. 工业建筑, 2017, 47(6): 30-33. DOI:10.13204/j.gyjz201706007.
Zhang Jianxin, Rong Xian, Wu Haichao. Experimental research on hysteretic behavior of exterior joints with 600 megapascal reinforced bars[J].Industrial Construction, 2017, 47(6): 30-33. DOI:10.13204/j.gyjz201706007. (in Chinese)
[15] 张健新, 戎贤, 刘平. 配置600 MPa钢筋高韧性混凝土框架中节点变形性能[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2017, 37(2): 165-172. DOI:10.13197/j.eeev.2017.02.165.zhangjx.019.
Zhang Jianxin, Rong Xian, Liu Ping. Deformation behavior of interior joints with 600 MPa reinforcement steel bar and high toughness concrete[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2017, 37(2): 165-172. DOI:10.13197/j.eeev.2017.02.165.zhangjx.019. (in Chinese)
[16] 杨晶文. 600 MPa级钢筋混凝土框架节点的延性性能研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学土木工程学院, 2014.
[17] Lee H J, Chang C J. High-strength reinforcement in exterior beam-column joints under cyclic loading[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2017, 114(5): 1325-1338. DOI:10.14359/51700788.
[18] Hwang H J, Park H G, Choi W S, et al. Cyclic loading test for beam-column connections with 600 MPa beam flexural reinforcing bars[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2014, 111(4): 913-924. DOI:10.14359/51686920.
[19] Chun S C, Choi C S, Jung H S. Side-face blowout failure of large-diameter high-strength headed bars in beam-column joints[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2017, 114(1): 161-171. DOI:10.14359/51689161.
[20] Chang B, Hutchinson T, Wang X, et al. Seismic performance of beam-column subassemblies with high-strength steel reinforcement[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2014, 111(6): 1329-1338. DOI:10.14359/51686997.
[21] 江苏省住房和城乡建设厅. DGJ32/TJ 202—2016热处理带肋高强钢筋混凝土结构技术规程[S]. 南京:江苏凤凰科学技术出版社, 2016.
[22] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB 50010—2015混凝土结构设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
[23] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. JGJ 1—2014 装配式混凝土结构技术规程[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2014.

相似文献/References:

[1]曹忠民,李爱群,王亚勇,等.钢绞线网片-聚合物砂浆加固空间框架节点试验[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2007,37(2):235.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2007.02.011]
 Cao Zhongmin,Li Aiqun,Wang Yayong,et al.Experimental study on RC space beam-column joints strengthened with high strength steel wire mesh and polymer mortar[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2007,37(6):235.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2007.02.011]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2018-05-25.
作者简介: 杨辉(1982—),男,博士生;郭正兴(联系人),男,教授,博士生导师,guozx195608@126.com.
基金项目: 科技部“十三五”国家重点研发计划专项资助项目(2016YFC0701703).
引用本文: 杨辉,郭正兴,尹航,等.高强底筋锚入式预制装配混凝土框架梁柱节点抗震试验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,48(6):979-986. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2018.06.001.
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-20