[1]王浩,柳家为,石棚,等.钢筋-金属波纹管灌浆连接的锚固性能试验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2020,50(2):215-221.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2020.02.002]
 Wang Hao,Liu Jiawei,Shi Peng,et al.Experimental study on anchorage performance of rebar-corrugated metal duct for grout splicing[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2020,50(2):215-221.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2020.02.002]
点击复制

钢筋-金属波纹管灌浆连接的锚固性能试验研究()
分享到:

《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-0505/CN:32-1178/N]

卷:
50
期数:
2020年第2期
页码:
215-221
栏目:
交通运输工程
出版日期:
2020-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Experimental study on anchorage performance of rebar-corrugated metal duct for grout splicing
作者:
王浩柳家为石棚陶天友祝青鑫
东南大学混凝土及预应力混凝土结构教育部重点实验室, 南京 210096
Author(s):
Wang Hao Liu Jiawei Shi Peng Tao Tianyou Zhu Qingxin
Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
关键词:
金属波纹管 灌浆连接 锚固性能 锚固长度 孔径比 螺旋箍筋约束
Keywords:
corrugated metal duct grout splicing anchorage performance anchorage length diameter ratio steel spiral confinement
分类号:
U445
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2020.02.002
摘要:
为研究钢筋-金属波纹管灌浆连接的锚固性能,设计并制作了23组灌浆连接试件.基于拉拔试验,分析了钢筋锚固长度la、孔径比D/d和螺旋箍筋约束等因素对灌浆连接锚固性能的影响.研究结果表明,试件的破坏形式包括钢筋拉断、钢筋拔出、金属波纹管拔出和混凝土开裂等4种,且以钢筋拉断为主.当孔径比D/d=1.90~2.23时,试件由于试验原因多未发生破坏,但钢筋均达到屈服强度.当孔径比D/d=2.52~3.50且锚固长度la≥10d时,试件破坏形式均表现为钢筋拉断.当孔径比D/d=1.90~3.50且锚固长度la=7d~24d时,钢筋的黏结刚度随锚固长度la和孔径比D/d的增大呈先增大后减小的趋势.在外径为89 mm的金属波纹管内加入螺旋箍筋后,钢筋黏结滑移量显著降低,锚固性能明显提升.在工程应用中,当钢筋直径不大于25 mm时,建议锚固长度la取10d~15d,孔径比D/d取2.50~3.50.
Abstract:
To study the anchorage performance of rebar-corrugated metal duct for grout splicing, 23 groups of grout splicing specimens were designed and produced. The effects of the factors such as the anchorage length la, the diameter ratio D/d and steel spiral confinement on the anchorage performance of rebar-corrugated metal duct for grout splicing were analyzed by pull-out tests. The results show that the failure modes of the specimens include rebar fracture, rebar pull-out, corrugated metal duct pull-out and concrete splitting, and the rebar fracture is the main failure mode. When D/d=1.90 to 2.30, most of the specimens don’t fail due to the test reasons, but the rebar can all reach yield strength. When D/d=2.52 to 3.50 and la≥10 d, the failure mode of specimens is all rebar fracture. When D/d=1.90 to 3.50 and la=7 to 24 d, with the increase of the anchorage length and the diameter ratio, the bond stiffness of the rebar increases first and then decreases. The slipment of the rebar can be effectively reduced by steel spiral inserted in corrugated metal duct with the outer diameter of 89 mm to improve the anchorage performance of the rebar. When the rebar diameter is no more than 25 mm, the anchorage length la is recommended to be 10d to 15d and the diameter ratio to be 2.50 to 3.50.

参考文献/References:

[1] Hieber D G,Wacker J M,Eberhard M O,et al.State-of-the-art report on precast concrete systems for rapid construction of bridges[R].Washing DC,USA:Washington State Transportation Center,2005.
[2] Khaleghi B,Schultz E,Seguirant S,et al.Accelerated bridge construction in Washington State:From research to practice[J].PCI Journal,2012,57(4):34-49.DOI:10.15554/pcij.09012012.34.49.
[3] 郑永峰,郭正兴.变形灌浆套筒连接性能试验研究及有限元分析[J].建筑结构学报,2016,37(3):94-102.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2016.03.012.
Zheng Y F,Guo Z X.Experimental study and finite element analysis on behavior of deformed gout-filled pipe splice[J].Journal of Building Structures,2016,37(3):94-102.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2016.03.012. (in Chinese)
[4] 余琼,许雪静,袁炜航,等.不同搭接长度下套筒约束浆锚搭接接头力学试验研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2017,44(9):82-91.DOI:10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb.2017.09.010.
Yu Q,Xu X J,Yuan W H,et al.Experimental study of mechanical properties of grouted sleeve lapping connector with different lap lengths under tensile load[J].Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences),2017,44(9):82-91.DOI:10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb.2017.09.010. (in Chinese)
[5] Zhou Y H,Ou Y C,Lee G C.Bond-slip responses of stainless reinforcing bars in grouted ducts[J].Engineering Structures,2017,141:651-665.DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.049.
[6] 陈俊,肖岩,尹齐.预埋波纹套管的钢筋-高强浇筑料黏结锚固性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2015,36(7):140-147.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2015.07.018.
Chen J,Xiao Y,Yin Q.Bonding strength of rebar anchorage in embedded corrugated sleeve with high strength grout[J].Journal of Building Structures,2015,36(7):140-147.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2015.07.018. (in Chinese)
[7] Ling J H,Abd Rahman A B,Ibrahim I S,et al.Behaviour of grouted pipe splice under incremental tensile load[J].Construction and Building Materials,2012,33:90-98.DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.001.
[8] Hosseini S J A,Rahman A B A.Effects of spiral confinement to the bond behavior of deformed reinforcement bars subjected to axial tension[J].Engineering Structures,2016,112:1-13.DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.038.
[9] 许成顺,刘洪涛,杜修力.高应力反复拉压作用下钢筋套筒灌浆连接性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2018,39(12):178-184,193.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2018.12.021.
Xu C S,Liu H T,Du X L.Experimental study on connection performance of grouted sleeve splicing for rebars under high stress repeated tension-compression loading[J].Journal of Building Structures,2018,39(12):178-184,193.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2018.12.021. (in Chinese)
[10] 王志强,卫张震,魏红一,等.预制拼装联接件形式对桥墩抗震性能的影响[J].中国公路学报,2017,30(5):74-80.DOI:10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2017.05.010.
Wang Z Q,Wei Z Z,Wei H Y,et al.Influences of precast segmental connector forms on seismic performance of bridge pier[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport,2017,30(5):74-80.DOI:10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2017.05.010. (in Chinese)
[11] 葛继平,夏樟华,江恒.灌浆波纹管装配式桥墩双向拟静力试验[J].中国公路学报,2018,31(12):221-230,266.DOI:10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2018.12.022.
Ge J P,Xia Z H,Jiang H.Biaxial quasi-static experiment of precast segmental bridge piers with grouting corrugated pipe connection[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport,2018,31(12):221-230,266.DOI:10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2018.12.022. (in Chinese)
[12] 国家质量技术监督局.GB/T 17671—1999 水泥胶砂强度检验方法(ISO法)[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1999.
[13] 中华人民共和国建设部和国家质量监督检验检疫局.GB/T 50081—2002 普通混凝土力学性能试验方法标准[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
[14] 余琼,许雪静,尤高帅.带肋钢筋与灌浆料黏结性能试验[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2017,49(12):91—101.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.036706234.201701088.
Yu Q,Xu X J,You G S.Experimental study on bond behavior for ribbed steel bars and grout[J].Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology,2017,49(12):91-101.DOI:10.11918/j.issn.036706234.201701088. (in Chinese)
[15] 徐有邻,沈文都,汪洪.钢筋砼粘结锚固性能的试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,1994,15(3):26-37.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.1994.03.004
Xu Y L,Shen W D,Wang H.An experimental study of bond-anchorage properties of bars in concrete[J].Journal of Building Structures,1994,15(3):26-37.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.1994.03.004(in Chinese)
[16] Walker P R,Batayneh M K,Regan P E.Bond strength tests on deformed reinforcement in normal weight concrete[J].Materials and Structures,1997,30(7):424-429.DOI:10.1007/bf02498566.
[17] 郑山锁,裴培,张艺欣,等.钢筋混凝土粘结滑移研究综述[J].材料导报,2018,32(23):4182-4191.DOI:10.11896/j.issn.1005-023X.2018.23.020.
Zheng S S,Pei P,Zhang Y X,et al.Review of research on bond-slip of reinforced concrete[J].Materials Review,2018,32(23):4182-4191.DOI:10.11896/j.issn.1005-023X.2018.23.020. (in Chinese)
[18] 上海市公路投资建设发展有限公司,上海市城市建设设计研究总院.DG/TJ 08-2160—2015 预制拼装桥墩技术规程[S].上海:同济大学出版社,2015.
[19] Alias A,Zubir M A,Shahid K A,et al.Structural performance of grouted sleeve connectors with and without transverse reinforcement for precast concrete structure[J].Procedia Engineering,2013,53:116-123.DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.017.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2019-09-05.
作者简介: 王浩(1980—),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,wanghao1980@seu.edu.cn.
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51578151)、国家“万人计划”青年拔尖人才资助项目(W03070080)、江苏省重点研发计划资助项目(BE2018120).
引用本文: 王浩,柳家为,石棚,等.钢筋-金属波纹管灌浆连接的锚固性能试验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2020,50(2):215-221. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2020.02.002.
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-20