[1]潘世富,王海燕,林徐勋.医保支付方式对慢性疾病患者和医院预防努力的影响[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2020,50(4):789-796.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2020.04.025]
 Pan Shifu,Wang Haiyan,Lin Xuxun.Effects of medical insurance payment on preventive efforts of patients with chronic diseases and hospitals[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2020,50(4):789-796.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2020.04.025]
点击复制

医保支付方式对慢性疾病患者和医院预防努力的影响()
分享到:

《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-0505/CN:32-1178/N]

卷:
50
期数:
2020年第4期
页码:
789-796
栏目:
经济与管理
出版日期:
2020-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of medical insurance payment on preventive efforts of patients with chronic diseases and hospitals
作者:
潘世富1王海燕1林徐勋12
1东南大学经济管理学院, 南京 211189; 2常州大学商学院, 常州 213159
Author(s):
Pan Shifu1 Wang Haiyan1 Lin Xuxun12
1School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
2Business School, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213159, China
关键词:
患者自我预防努力 社区医院预防努力 三级医院治疗努力 混合支付方式
Keywords:
self-preventive effort of patient preventive effort of community hospitals treatment effort of tertiary hospital mixed payment
分类号:
C931.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2020.04.025
摘要:
为了研究按服务项目支付、按总额支付和混合支付3种支付方式对慢性疾病患者及医院预防努力的激励作用,以患者效用、医院收益及社会总效用最大为目标建立优化模型. 分析了混合支付方式中混合比例系数对患者自我预防努力、社区医院预防努力和三级医院治疗努力的影响,计算了3种支付方式和社会总效用最大时患者自我预防努力、社区医院预防努力及三级医院治疗努力的均衡解,比较了3种支付方式的社会总效用值.结果表明,混合支付方式下患者自我预防努力、社区医院预防努力及社会总效用最大.政府采用混合支付方式有助于激励患者和医院采取预防努力,并实现社会总效用最大.
Abstract:
To study the incentive effect of pay by service item, pay by total amount and mixed payment on the preventive efforts of chronic disease patients and hospitals, an optimization model was established for maximizing the patient utility, the hospital revenue and the total social utility. The influences of the mixed proportion coefficient on the self-preventive effort of patients, the preventive effort of community hospital and the treatment effort of tertiary hospital were analyzed. The equilibrium solutions of the self-preventive effort of patients, the preventive effort of community hospital and the treatment effort of tertiary hospital on three payment modes and the maximum of total social utility were calculated. The total social utility values of the three payment modes were compared. The results show that the self-preventive effort of patient, the preventive effort of community hospital, and the total social utility are maximum on the mixed payment mode. The government’s use of the mixed payment will help to encourage the patients and the hospitals to take preventive efforts and achieve the maximum total social utility.

参考文献/References:

[1] Lai S, Gao J M, Zhou Z L, et al.Prevalences and trends of chronic diseases in Shaanxi Province, China: Evidence from representative cross-sectional surveys in 2003, 2008 and 2013[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(8): e0202886. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0202886.
[2] Eijkenaar F, Emmert M, Scheppach M, et al. Effects of pay for performance in health care: A systematic review of systematic reviews[J]. Health Policy, 2013, 110(2/3): 115-130. DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.008.
[3] Tsiachristas A, Dikkers C, Boland M R S, et al. Exploring payment schemes used to promote integrated chronic care in Europe[J]. Health Policy, 2013, 113(3): 296-304. DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.07.007.
[4] 宫芳芳, 孙喜琢, 王承馨. 以居民健康管理为核心实现医保支付方式突破性改革[J]. 中国医院, 2016, 20(11): 59-61. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-0592.2016.11.018.
Gong F F, Sun X Z, Wang C X. Resident health management centered medical insurance payment reform[J]. Chinese Hospitals, 2016, 20(11): 59-61. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-0592.2016.11.018. (in Chinese)
[5] Dietz W H, Douglas C E, Brownson R C. Chronic disease prevention: Tobacco avoidance, physical activity, and nutrition for a healthy start[J]. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2016, 316(16): 1645-1646. DOI:10.1001/jama.2016.14370.
[6] 田昕, 梁丽, 辛有清. 公立医院制度改革对医疗质量管理的影响探讨[J]. 中国医院管理, 2015, 35(5): 4-6.
  Tian X, Liang L, Xin Y Q. Effect exploration of payment system reform of public hospitals for medical quality management[J]. Chinese Hospital Management, 2015, 35(5): 4-6.(in Chinese)
[7] 程晓明, 于跃, 盛锋, 等. 社区卫生服务项目成本测算方法[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2004, 23(10): 48-50. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0743.2004.10.020.
Cheng X M, Yu Y, Sheng F, et al. Accounting method of item cost on the community health service[J].Chinese Health Economics, 2004, 23(10): 48-50. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0743.2004.10.020. (in Chinese)
[8] Guo P F, Tang C S, Wang Y L, et al. The impact of reimbursement policy on social welfare, revisit rate, and waiting time in a public healthcare system: Fee-for-service versus bundled payment[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2018, 21(1): 154-170. DOI: 10.1287/msom.2017.0690.
[9] Gupta D, Mehrotra M. Bundled payments for healthcare services: Proposer selection and information sharing[J].Operations Research, 2015, 63(4): 772-788. DOI:10.1287/opre.2015.1403.
[10] Andritsos D A, Tang C S. Incentive programs for reducing readmissions when patient care is co-produced[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2018, 27(6): 999-1020. DOI:10.1111/poms.12847.
[11] 杨金侠, 王禄生. 新型农村合作医疗实施混合支付方式的构想[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2006(3): 5-8. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-7778.2006.03.002.
Yang J X, Wang L S. Suggestion on mixed payment in new rural cooperative medical service[J]. Health Economics Research, 2006(3): 5-8. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-7778.2006.03.002. (in Chinese)

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2019-12-26.
作者简介: 潘世富(1990—),男,博士生;王海燕(联系人),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,hywang@seu.edu.cn.
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(71531004).
引用本文: 潘世富,王海燕,林徐勋.医保支付方式对慢性疾病患者和医院预防努力的影响[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2020,50(4):789-796. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2020.04.025.
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-20