[1]董亦楠,沈旸,韩冬青.再构 “城堰一体”:入遗效应和灾后重建双重影响下的都江堰整体文化景观呈现[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,(1):71-79.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2021.01.010]
 Dong Yinan,Shen Yang,Han Dongqing.Integration of Dujiangyan irrigation system and ancient town: Presentation of Dujiangyan cultural landscape under dual influences of world heritage effect and post-earthquake reconstruction[J].Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition),2021,(1):71-79.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2021.01.010]
点击复制

再构 “城堰一体”:入遗效应和灾后重建双重影响下的都江堰整体文化景观呈现()
分享到:

《东南大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1001-0505/CN:32-1178/N]

卷:
期数:
2021年第1期
页码:
71-79
栏目:
建筑学
出版日期:
2021-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Integration of Dujiangyan irrigation system and ancient town: Presentation of Dujiangyan cultural landscape under dual influences of world heritage effect and post-earthquake reconstruction
作者:
董亦楠1沈旸12韩冬青1
1东南大学建筑学院, 南京 210096; 2东南大学传统木构建筑营造技艺研究国家文物局重点科研基地, 南京 210096
Author(s):
Dong Yinan1 Shen Yang12 Han Dongqing1
1School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
2Key Scientific Research Base of Technology of Traditional Wooden Architecture, State Administration for Cultural Heritage, China, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
关键词:
都江堰水利工程 灌县古城 城市再生 要素 文化景观
Keywords:
Dujiangyan irrigation system Guanxian ancient town urban regeneration element cultural landscape
分类号:
TU05
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2021.01.010
摘要:
为了协调历史文化名城保护与城市发展,结合中国传统城市营造理念与文化景观方法探索入遗效应和灾后重建双重影响下的都江堰保护与再生方法.通过对都江堰古城和堰区内外各类要素及其关联性的研究,再构“城堰一体”整体性文化景观体系,为都江堰市总体城市设计提供思路.研究表明,基于要素关联形成的都江堰水利工程与古城的互依共生关系,是城市形态和城市职能诞生、演化的重要动因;目前要素相互独立,依托要素展开的传统城市职能和活动几乎不存在,古城价值和城堰关系没有得到充分展现.“城堰一体”整体文化景观的再构和呈现不仅可以重新发掘遗产和城市的共生关系,也能最大化遗产价值,为城市发展注入活力.
Abstract:
To coordinate the conservation and the development of the historic cities, a conservation and regeneration method for Dujiangyan City Sichuan Province in China under the dual influences on the world heritage effect and the post-earthquake reconstruction by combining the traditional Chinese urban construction theory and a cultural landscape concept was explored. Through the study of elements inside and outside of Dujiangyan city and their correlation, the integration of the irrigation system and the ancient town was reconstructed, and the ideas for the urban design were provided. The research results show that the mutuality relationship between the irrigation system and the ancient town is based on the association of elements. It is an important reason for the birth and the evolution of urban form and function. Now, the elements are independent of each other, and most of the city functions and activities relying on the elements do not exist, so the value of the ancient city and the relationship with irrigation system cannot be fully demonstrated. The reconstruction and the presentation of the cultural landscape system can explore the symbiotic relationship between the heritage and the city, and maximize the heritage value thus injecting vitality into the urban development.

参考文献/References:

[1] 周俭,夏南凯.立足跨越发展的都江堰城区灾后重建规划思想:关于空间、时间、形态的关系[J].城市规划学刊,2008(4):1-5.
  Zhou J,Xia N K.Arestrospection of post-earthquake reconstruction and redevelopment planning in Dujiangyan urban area based on the leapfrogging development:About the relationship among space,time and form[J].Urban Planning Forum,2008(4):1-5.(in Chinese)
[2] 罗·范·奥尔斯,韩锋,王溪.城市历史景观的概念及其与文化景观的联系[J].中国园林,2012,28(5):16-18.
  Ron V O,Han F,Wang X,The concept of historic urban landscape(HUL)and its relation to cultural landscape[J].Chinese Landscape Architecture,2012,28(5):16-18.(in Chinese)
[3] 韩锋.探索前行中的文化景观[J].中国园林,2012,28(5):5-9.
  Han F.Cultural landscape:Marching on the way of exploration[J].Chinese Landscape Architecture,2012,28(5):5-9.(in Chinese)
[4] 姚圣.中国广州和英国伯明翰历史街区形态的比较研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2013.
  Yao S.Comparative study between urban morphology of the historical districts in Guangzhou and birmingham[D].Guangzhou:South China University of Technology,2013.(in Chinese)
[5] 成一农.“科学”还是“非科学”:被误读的中国传统舆图[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(2):20-27.
  Cheng Y N.“Science” or “non-science”:The misunderstood Chinese traditional maps[J].Journal of Xiamen University(Arts & Social Sciences),2014(2):20-27.(in Chinese)
[6] 余定国.中国地图学史[M].姜道章,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2006:45.
[7] 芮沃寿.中国城市的宇宙论[M]//施坚雅.中华帝国晚期的城市.叶光庭,等译,北京:中华书局,2000:37.
[8] 成一农.宋、元以及明代前中期城市城墙政策的演变及其原因[M]//中村圭尔,辛德勇.中日古代城市研究.北京:中国社会科学出版社.2004:145-183.
[9] 鲁西奇.城墙内外:古代汉水流域城市的形态与空间结构[M].北京:中华书局,2011:444.
[10] 鲁西奇,马剑.城墙内的城市?——中国古代治所城市形态的再认识[J].中国社会经济史研究,2009(2):7-16.
  Lu X Q,Ma J.The city surrounded by the wall?:Recognition of Urban morphology of the city where the ancient chinese government located[J].The Journal of Chinese Social and Economic History,2009(2):7-16.(in Chinese)
[11] 鲁西奇.中国历史的空间结构[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2014:356.
[12] 斯蒂芬·福伊希特旺.学宫与城隍[M]//施坚雅.中华帝国晚期的城市.北京:中华书局,2000:725.
[13] 滨岛敦俊.朱元璋政权城隍改制考[J].史学集刊,1995(4):7-15.
[14] 高俊飞.明清江南地区城隍庙建筑研究暨南京浦口城隍庙修缮设计[D].南京:南京工业大学,2016.
  Gao J F.Research on the town-God temple architecture in Ming ang qing dynasties taking Pukou’s town-God temple Nanjing for instance[D].Nanjing:Nanjing University of Technology,2016.(in Chinese)
[15] 沈旸.垂教于世:中国古代地方城市的孔庙[J].书摘,2015(2):47-50.
[16] 沈旸.东方儒光:中国古代城市孔庙研究[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2015:268.
[17] 庄思恒,郑珶山.增修灌县志[M].1886.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2020-05-17.
作者简介: 董亦楠(1986—),男,博士;沈旸(联系人),男,博士,副教授,101011326@seu.edu.cn.
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52008083)、国家社会科学基金资助项目(18BGL278)、中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2020M681458)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2242020R20007).
引用本文: 董亦楠,沈旸,韩冬青.再构 “城堰一体”:入遗效应和灾后重建双重影响下的都江堰整体文化景观呈现[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,51(1):71-79. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2021.01.010.
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-01-20